Patrick Maloney vs Aidan Mayo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In analyzing the upcoming tennis match, a comparison of player statistics provides valuable insights into predicting potential outcomes. Second serve performance presents an essential metric where Mayo has demonstrated a higher effectiveness, winning 47.86% of points over the past six months as opposed to Maloney's 43.89%. This stat is strongly linked to forecasting match results.

Considering return game capabilities, subtle differences are seen between the players. In recent months, Maloney has an edge in winning 46.92% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Mayo's 46.19%. For first serve returns, Maloney again leads slightly with 27.93%, while Mayo has achieved a 26.55% success rate. These numbers suggest a narrow edge for Maloney in return proficiency.

Examining performance under pressure reveals that Mayo has managed to save 49.74% of breakpoints recently, whereas Maloney has shown greater resilience by saving 54.17%. Such stats can influence in-game predictions heavily. Furthermore, Mayo has a lower breakpoint conversion rate of 37.24%, compared to Maloney's 30.77%, providing additional layers to betting strategies when break opportunities arise.

A focus on performance overview over the past year shows Mayo has secured 47.27% wins out of matches played (W/L 26/29), against Maloney's impressive 67.11% (W/L 51/25). Key differences are also noted in surface performance where Mayo excels on Hard courts, encompassing a 56% career win rate, whereas Maloney prefers Indoor Hard, boasting a 69% success rate. Maloney's versatility across Hard surfaces is further highlighted with a 61% win rate even on their least favorable surface.

Analyzing match statistics at different tournament levels, Mayo predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF circuits with a 49.02% win rate (W/L 25/26), while Maloney plays more frequently in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K category, achieving a 75% win rate (W/L 33/11). However, Mayo faces stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 303.18, compared to Maloney's average opponent rank of 438.46.

The performance in deciding sets is telling, with Mayo having won just 38% of deciding sets over the past year, in stark contrast to Maloney's 78% success rate. These figures strongly suggest Maloney's ability to close out matches under pressure. Ultimately, this data combined with a better overall win-loss record, higher breakpoint conversion potential, and favorable return stats, positions Maloney as the likely winner in this matchup.